TY - JOUR
T1 - δ-Bonding modulates the electronic structure of formally divalent nd1 rare earth arene complexes
AU - MacKenzie, Ross E.
AU - Hajdu, Tomáš
AU - Seed, John A.
AU - Whitehead, George F. S.
AU - Adams, Ralph W.
AU - Chilton, Nicholas F.
AU - Collison, David
AU - McInnes, Eric J. L.
AU - Goodwin, Conrad A. P.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Metal–arene contacts in divalent rare earth complexes can give rise formal 4f n d( x 2 − y 2 ) valence electron configurations where metal–arene δ-bonding modulates the electronic structure. Rare earth ions without d-contribution ( i.e. f n +1 ) are unaffected. Landmark advances in rare earth (RE) chemistry have shown that divalent complexes can be isolated with non-Aufbau 4f n 5d/6s 1 electron configurations, facilitating remarkable bonding motifs and magnetic properties. We report a series of divalent bis-tethered arene complexes, [RE(NHAr iPr 6 ) 2 ] (2RE; RE = Sc, Y, La, Sm, Eu, Tm, Yb; NHAr iPr 6 = N(H)C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 2 -2,4,6- i Pr 3 ) 2 ). Fluid solution EPR spectroscopy gives g iso textless 2.002 for 2Sc, 2Y, and 2La, consistent with formal nd 1 configurations, calculations reveal metal–arene δ-bonding via mixing of nd ( x 2 − y 2 ) valence electrons into arene π* orbitals. Experimental and calculated EPR and UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopic properties for 2Y show that minor structural changes markedly alter the metal d ( x 2 − y 2 ) contribution to the SOMO. This contrasts 4f n 5d/6s 1 complexes where the valence d-based electron resides in a non-bonding orbital. Complexes 2Sm, 2Eu, 2Tm, and 2Yb contain highly-localised 4f n +1 ions with no appreciable metal–arene bonding by density functional calculations. These results show that the physicochemical properties of divalent rare earth arene complexes with both formal nd 1 and 4f n +1 configurations are nuanced, may be controlled through ligand modification, and require a multi-pronged experimental and theoretical approach to fully rationalise.
AB - Metal–arene contacts in divalent rare earth complexes can give rise formal 4f n d( x 2 − y 2 ) valence electron configurations where metal–arene δ-bonding modulates the electronic structure. Rare earth ions without d-contribution ( i.e. f n +1 ) are unaffected. Landmark advances in rare earth (RE) chemistry have shown that divalent complexes can be isolated with non-Aufbau 4f n 5d/6s 1 electron configurations, facilitating remarkable bonding motifs and magnetic properties. We report a series of divalent bis-tethered arene complexes, [RE(NHAr iPr 6 ) 2 ] (2RE; RE = Sc, Y, La, Sm, Eu, Tm, Yb; NHAr iPr 6 = N(H)C 6 H 3 -2,6-(C 6 H 2 -2,4,6- i Pr 3 ) 2 ). Fluid solution EPR spectroscopy gives g iso textless 2.002 for 2Sc, 2Y, and 2La, consistent with formal nd 1 configurations, calculations reveal metal–arene δ-bonding via mixing of nd ( x 2 − y 2 ) valence electrons into arene π* orbitals. Experimental and calculated EPR and UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopic properties for 2Y show that minor structural changes markedly alter the metal d ( x 2 − y 2 ) contribution to the SOMO. This contrasts 4f n 5d/6s 1 complexes where the valence d-based electron resides in a non-bonding orbital. Complexes 2Sm, 2Eu, 2Tm, and 2Yb contain highly-localised 4f n +1 ions with no appreciable metal–arene bonding by density functional calculations. These results show that the physicochemical properties of divalent rare earth arene complexes with both formal nd 1 and 4f n +1 configurations are nuanced, may be controlled through ligand modification, and require a multi-pronged experimental and theoretical approach to fully rationalise.
U2 - 10.1039/D4SC03005B
DO - 10.1039/D4SC03005B
M3 - Article
SN - 2041-6520
VL - 15
SP - 15160
EP - 15169
JO - Chemical Science
JF - Chemical Science
IS - 37
ER -