1996: Lazarus Rises

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Paul Keating has claimed that Australia would be a republic today if he had won the 1996 federal election, but change is hard. Public opinion was on his side in the republic debate, but his attempts to bundle the republic issue into a broad vision of large-scale social reform were less popular. Keatings government promised a new Australian identity: confident, outward-looking, socially progressive, not pitching to mass public opinion or apologising for its progressiveness. The landslide electoral result that brought John Howards nearly 12 year government into power suggests that Keatings plan for Australia was too much, too fast, for most Australians. Howards victory on a platform of minimal reform and traditional values, his remarkable tenure as prime minister, and the political approaches of subsequent Labor governments reflect Australian voters inherent conservatism. For better or worse, 1996 was an archetype for the disciplined, small target campaigns that so often win Australian elections. Political survival and risk minimisation now characterise Australian politics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationElections Matter: Ten Federal Elections that shaped Australia
    EditorsBenjamin T Jones, Frank Bongiorno, John Uhr
    Place of PublicationVictoria
    PublisherMonash University Publishing
    Pages161-189
    Volume1
    Edition1st edition
    ISBN (Print)9781925523157
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '1996: Lazarus Rises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this