75 Anos de vestigaÇõÇæes ArqueolÇügicas em Timor-Leste (75 Years of Archaeological Research in Timor-Leste)

Nuno Oliveira

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    The island of Timor, the largest of the Lesser Sunda Islands, soon attracted the attention of researchers in various fields, including anthropologists, ethnographers, geologists, botanists and archaeologists. The western half of the island, part of the Dutch East Indies until 1949, and the Eastern Islands of Indonesia from then onwards, saw most research being conducted by Dutch scholars. The eastern part of Timor was primarily targeted by Portuguese researchers, whose colonial period lasted from the mid-sixteenth century until 1975. The first period of archaeological research in Timor, in the 1930s, was generally of low quality, developed mainly by non-archaeologists and resulted in very few publications. Most fieldwork took place before radiometric dating methods were in use, which led to an erroneous interpretation of the nature and age of some excavated deposits. It was not until the late 1960s and especially after the restoration of independence, in 2002, that a chronological sequence for the cultural prehistory of Timor-Leste, based on modern archaeological practice and consistent radiometric determinations, was to be known.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages1-27pp
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    EventSeminário Timor: Missões Científicas e Antropologia Colonial, IICT 2011 - East Timor, Timor-Leste
    Duration: 1 Jan 2012 → …
    http://www.historyanthropologytimor.org/wp--‐content/uploads/2012/04/23--‐OLIVEIRA_NV.pdf

    Conference

    ConferenceSeminário Timor: Missões Científicas e Antropologia Colonial, IICT 2011
    Country/TerritoryTimor-Leste
    Period1/01/12 → …
    OtherMay 24-25 2011
    Internet address

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '75 Anos de vestigaÇõÇæes ArqueolÇügicas em Timor-Leste (75 Years of Archaeological Research in Timor-Leste)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this