TY - JOUR
T1 - Aβ imaging with 18F-florbetaben in prodromal Alzheimer's disease
T2 - A prospective outcome study
AU - Ong, Kevin T.
AU - Villemagne, Victor L.
AU - Bahar-Fuchs, Alex
AU - Lamb, Fiona
AU - Langdon, Narelle
AU - Catafau, Ana M.
AU - Stephens, Andrew W.
AU - Seibyl, John
AU - Dinkelborg, Ludger M.
AU - Reininger, Cornelia B.
AU - Putz, Barbara
AU - Rohde, Beate
AU - Masters, Colin L.
AU - Rowe, Christopher C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Background: We assessed the clinical utility of β-amyloid (Aβ) imaging with 18F- florbetaben (FBB) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by evaluating its prognostic accuracy for progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD), comparing semiquantitative with visual scan assessment, and exploring the relationships among Aβ, hippocampal volume (HV) and memory over time. Methods: 45 MCI underwent FBB positron emission tomography, MRI and neuropsychological assessment at baseline and 2 years and clinical follow-up at 4 years. Positive FBB (FBB+), de fined by a cortical to cerebellar cortex standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR) ≥1.45, was compared with visual assessment by five readers. Amnestic MCI (aMCI) was defined by a composite episodic memory (EM) Z-score of <-1.5. Results: At baseline, 24 (53%) MCI were FBB+. Majority reads agreed with SUVR classification (κ 0.96). In 2 years, 18 (75%) FBB+ progressed to AD compared with 2 (9.5%) FBB-, yielding a predictive accuracy of 83% (95% CI 61% to 94%). Four FBB- developed non-AD dementia. Predictive accuracies of HV (58% (95% CI 42% to 73%)) and aMCI status (73% (95% CI 58% to 81%)) were lower. Combinations did not improve accuracy. By 4 years, 21 (87.5%) FBB+ had AD whereas 5 (24%) FBB- had non-AD dementia yielding a predictive accuracy of 94% (95% CI 74% to 99%). While the strong baseline association between FBB SUVR and EM declined over 2 years, the association between EM and HV became stronger. FBB SUVR increased 2.2%/year in FBB+ with no change in FBB-. Conclusions: 18F-florbetaben Aβ imaging facilitates accurate detection of prodromal AD. As neurodegeneration progresses, and in contrast with the early stages of the disease, hippocampal atrophy and not Aβ, seems to drive memory decline.
AB - Background: We assessed the clinical utility of β-amyloid (Aβ) imaging with 18F- florbetaben (FBB) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by evaluating its prognostic accuracy for progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD), comparing semiquantitative with visual scan assessment, and exploring the relationships among Aβ, hippocampal volume (HV) and memory over time. Methods: 45 MCI underwent FBB positron emission tomography, MRI and neuropsychological assessment at baseline and 2 years and clinical follow-up at 4 years. Positive FBB (FBB+), de fined by a cortical to cerebellar cortex standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR) ≥1.45, was compared with visual assessment by five readers. Amnestic MCI (aMCI) was defined by a composite episodic memory (EM) Z-score of <-1.5. Results: At baseline, 24 (53%) MCI were FBB+. Majority reads agreed with SUVR classification (κ 0.96). In 2 years, 18 (75%) FBB+ progressed to AD compared with 2 (9.5%) FBB-, yielding a predictive accuracy of 83% (95% CI 61% to 94%). Four FBB- developed non-AD dementia. Predictive accuracies of HV (58% (95% CI 42% to 73%)) and aMCI status (73% (95% CI 58% to 81%)) were lower. Combinations did not improve accuracy. By 4 years, 21 (87.5%) FBB+ had AD whereas 5 (24%) FBB- had non-AD dementia yielding a predictive accuracy of 94% (95% CI 74% to 99%). While the strong baseline association between FBB SUVR and EM declined over 2 years, the association between EM and HV became stronger. FBB SUVR increased 2.2%/year in FBB+ with no change in FBB-. Conclusions: 18F-florbetaben Aβ imaging facilitates accurate detection of prodromal AD. As neurodegeneration progresses, and in contrast with the early stages of the disease, hippocampal atrophy and not Aβ, seems to drive memory decline.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925348838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308094
DO - 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308094
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-3050
VL - 86
SP - 431
EP - 436
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
IS - 4
ER -