A best choice among asset pricing models? The Conditional Capital Asset Pricing Model in Australia

Nick Durack*, Robert B. Durand, Ross A. Maller

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    46 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We use Australian data to test the Conditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (Jagannathan and Wang, 1996). Our results are generally supportive: the model performs well compared with a number of competing asset pricing models. In contrast to the study by Jagannathan and Wang, however, we find that the inclusion of the market for human capital does not save the concept of the time-independent market beta (it remains insignificant). We find support for the role of a small-minus-big factor in pricing the cross-section of returns and find grounds to disagree with Jagannathan and Wang's argument that this factor proxies for misspecified market risk.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)139-162
    Number of pages24
    JournalAccounting and Finance
    Volume44
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A best choice among asset pricing models? The Conditional Capital Asset Pricing Model in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this