Abstract
There are place names all around the world formed by a combination of two elements, a specific and a generic, both of which refer to the same geographic feature type. A typical pattern is for an indigenous generic functioning as a specific to precede a matching introduced generic. For example: Ohio River <Iroquoian Ohio Great River + River; and Lake Rotorua < MÄori roto lake + rua two/second (Second Lake) + Lake. Such toponyms, though not overall numerous, nevertheless occur often enough to warrant being recognized as a distinct class of place names. The literature provides no adequate or consistent term for this pattern: the various attempts clash with each other, and all fail to address the concept effectively. This article aims to address this situation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-77 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Names |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Apr 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Clash of Names: The Terminological Morass of a Toponym Class'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver