A Comparative Analysis of Bibliographic Ontologies: Implications for the Digital Humanities

Terhi Nurmikko-Fuller, J Jett, T Cole, C. Maden, K.R. Page, J.S. Downie

    Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting Abstractpeer-review

    Abstract

    In the ever-expanding world of digital libraries and cultural heritage collections, bibliographic metadata standards provide a structured approach to managing resources. The capture of additional contextual information further supports the identification, selection, and use of the resources described. As the problem spaces and areas of study of Humanities scholars are increasingly diversified (Henry and Smith, 2010) and supported by digital material and methods, existent approaches and systems are falling short of the needs of users (Fenlon et al., 2014; Varvel and Thomer, 2011). In short, research agendas and investigations have begun to evolve beyond searches based on traditional metadata parameters (author, date, publication place, genre)
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalDIGITAL HUMANITIES 2016
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    EventDigital Humanities DH2016 - Krakow
    Duration: 1 Jan 2016 → …
    http://dh2016.adho.org/

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparative Analysis of Bibliographic Ontologies: Implications for the Digital Humanities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this