A comparison between digital and analog Pound-Drever-Hall laser stabilization

Timothy T.Y. Lam, Sheon Chua, Bram J.J. Slagmolen, Jong H. Chow, Ian C.M. Littler, David E. McClelland, Daniel A. Shaddock

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We locked a laser to a cavity using an all-digital Pound-Drever-Hall feedback system. By performing the demodulation and feedback controller digitally the low frequency noise performance was improved compared to a conventional analog system.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, CLEO/QELS 2009
    Publication statusPublished - 2009
    Event2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, CLEO/QELS 2009 - Baltimore, MD, United States
    Duration: 2 Jun 20094 Jun 2009

    Publication series

    Name2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, CLEO/QELS 2009

    Conference

    Conference2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, CLEO/QELS 2009
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CityBaltimore, MD
    Period2/06/094/06/09

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison between digital and analog Pound-Drever-Hall laser stabilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this