A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version

Judy M. Ryan*, John R. Corry, Robyn Attewell, Michael J. Smithson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    100 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Because of its sound psychometric properties the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire is used throughout the world, yet it is difficult to analyse and score. Using a newly developed software package, onto which any questionnaire can be loaded, we developed an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire. The purpose of this study is test the effect of the electronic mode of administration on the measurement properties of the SF-36. In a randomised cross-over design study 79 healthy individuals and 36 chronic pain patients completed both electronic and paper versions of the SF-36. Seventy-one percent preferred the electronic SF-36, 7% stated no preference, and 22% preferred the paper version. Completion time for the electronic SF-36 was slightly less, and there were no missing or problematical responses, whereas 44% of participants had at least one missing or problematical response in the paper version. Data entry and auditing time was 8 hours. There was less than 4% inter-version difference for any of the SF-36 sub-scales. The electronic SF-36 was well accepted and slightly quicker to complete than the paper version. We conclude that the electronic SF-36 is equivalent in performance and more effective than the paper version.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)19-26
    Number of pages8
    JournalQuality of Life Research
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this