TY - JOUR
T1 - A controlled evaluation of social prescribing on loneliness for adults in Queensland
T2 - 8-week outcomes
AU - Dingle, Genevieve A.
AU - Sharman, Leah S.
AU - Hayes, Shaun
AU - Haslam, Catherine
AU - Cruwys, Tegan
AU - Jetten, Jolanda
AU - Haslam, S. Alexander
AU - McNamara, Niamh
AU - Chua, David
AU - Baker, James R.
AU - Johnson, Tracey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Dingle, Sharman, Hayes, Haslam, Cruwys, Jetten, Haslam, McNamara, Chua, Baker and Johnson.
PY - 2024/4/12
Y1 - 2024/4/12
N2 - Introduction There have been few controlled evaluations of Social Prescribing (SP), in which link workers support lonely individuals to engage with community-based social activities. This study reports early outcomes of a trial comparing General Practitioner treatment-as-usual (TAU) with TAU combined with Social Prescribing (SP) in adults experiencing loneliness in Queensland.Methods Participants were 114 individuals who were non-randomly assigned to one of two conditions (SP, n = 63; TAU, n = 51) and assessed at baseline and 8 weeks, on primary outcomes (loneliness, well-being, health service use in past 2 months) and secondary outcomes (social anxiety, psychological distress, social trust).Results Retention was high (79.4%) in the SP condition. Time x condition interaction effects were found for loneliness and social trust, with improvement observed only in SP participants over the 8-week period. SP participants reported significant improvement on all other outcomes with small-to-moderate effect sizes (ULS-8 loneliness, wellbeing, psychological distress, social anxiety). However, interaction effects did not reach significance.Discussion Social prescribing effects were small to moderate at the 8-week follow up. Group-based activities are available in communities across Australia, however, further research using well-matched control samples and longer-term follow ups are required to provide robust evidence to support a wider roll out.
AB - Introduction There have been few controlled evaluations of Social Prescribing (SP), in which link workers support lonely individuals to engage with community-based social activities. This study reports early outcomes of a trial comparing General Practitioner treatment-as-usual (TAU) with TAU combined with Social Prescribing (SP) in adults experiencing loneliness in Queensland.Methods Participants were 114 individuals who were non-randomly assigned to one of two conditions (SP, n = 63; TAU, n = 51) and assessed at baseline and 8 weeks, on primary outcomes (loneliness, well-being, health service use in past 2 months) and secondary outcomes (social anxiety, psychological distress, social trust).Results Retention was high (79.4%) in the SP condition. Time x condition interaction effects were found for loneliness and social trust, with improvement observed only in SP participants over the 8-week period. SP participants reported significant improvement on all other outcomes with small-to-moderate effect sizes (ULS-8 loneliness, wellbeing, psychological distress, social anxiety). However, interaction effects did not reach significance.Discussion Social prescribing effects were small to moderate at the 8-week follow up. Group-based activities are available in communities across Australia, however, further research using well-matched control samples and longer-term follow ups are required to provide robust evidence to support a wider roll out.
KW - community
KW - group programs
KW - health
KW - loneliness
KW - social prescribing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191365889&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359855
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1359855
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85191365889
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1359855
ER -