A critique in need of critique

Matt Peterson*, Aidan Hollis, Thomas Pogge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Is it really necessary to add something like the Health Impact Fund to the existing global patent system We can divide this question into two parts. First, is there something seriously wrong with the status quo and, if so, what exactly is it Second, how do we best go about solving the problem; that is, how does the design of the reform proposal address the flaws in the status quo Jorn Sonderholm, in his critique of the Health Impact Fund, or HIF, raises both of these issues. These criticisms afford us the opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to ameliorating glaring problems with the current system for incentivizing R&D for essential medicines, and to clarify why we believe the HIF is exactly what the world needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-185
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health Ethics
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Cite this