Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A fast and powerful W-test for pairwise epistasis testing

  • Maggie Haitian Wang*
  • , Rui Sun
  • , Junfeng Guo
  • , Haoyi Weng
  • , Jack Lee
  • , Inchi Hu
  • , Pak Chung Sham
  • , Benny Chung Ying Zee
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    24 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Epistasis plays an essential role in the development of complex diseases. Interaction methods face common challenge of seeking a balance between persistent power, model complexity, computation efficiency, and validity of identified bio-markers. We introduce a novel W-test to identify pairwise epistasis effect, which measures the distributional difference between cases and controls through a combined log odds ratio. The test is model-free, fast, and inherits a Chi-squared distribution with data adaptive degrees of freedom. No permutation is needed to obtain the P-values. Simulation studies demonstrated that the W-test is more powerful in low frequency variants environment than alternative methods, which are the Chi-squared test, logistic regression and multifactor-dimensionality reduction (MDR). In two independent real bipolar disorder genome-wide associations (GWAS) datasets, the W-test identified significant interactions pairs that can be replicated, including SLIT3-CENPN, SLIT3-TMEM132D, CNTNAP2-NDST4 and CNTCAP2-RTN4R. The genes in the pairs play central roles in neurotransmission and synapse formation. A majority of the identified loci are undiscoverable by main effect and are low frequency variants. The proposed method offers a powerful alternative tool for mapping the genetic puzzle underlying complex disorders.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e115
    JournalNucleic Acids Research
    Volume44
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A fast and powerful W-test for pairwise epistasis testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this