Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A global systematic review of the influence of competition on the outcomes of fauna conservation

Aurelie M. Kanishka*, Nick Dexter, Chris R. Dickman, Natasha M. Robinson, David B. Lindenmayer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Ecosystems typically exhibit resilience to disturbances, yet excessive pressure can disrupt species interactions, resulting in biodiversity loss. Conservation interventions strive to safeguard ecosystems and reinstate vital ecological functions. Competition between animals plays a pivotal role in ecosystem persistence and dynamics, but its significance is often underestimated in conservation research. We conducted a global review that analyzed 147 articles, focusing on the impact of competitive interactions between animals on conservation interventions. We found a tendency for researchers to retrospectively interpret observed patterns of interactions as competitive. Negative outcomes, such as species declines, were frequently associated with competitive interactions. Despite efforts to predict outcomes using characteristics of the competition process, we found no consistent patterns of outcomes based on these characteristics. Our findings underscore the considerable influence that competition may have on conservation outcomes, emphasizing a need for proactive consideration of competition dynamics as part of planning conservation interventions. By integrating animal competition into conservation planning, monitoring, and mitigation efforts, unexpected negative impacts can be minimized, fostering more effective conservation outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70026
Number of pages13
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume7
Issue number4
Early online date20 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A global systematic review of the influence of competition on the outcomes of fauna conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this