“A Healthy Nationalism”: The Inclusion of Indigenous Australians in the Federal Cultural Policymaking of the 1960s and 1970s

Eleanor Foster*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article argues that the inclusion of Indigenous Australian arts within federal cultural policymaking transitioned during the 1960s and 1970s from a salvage paradigm of value towards policies articulating self-determined Indigenous representation and the potential for a “healthy nationalism”. The Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies (1964), the Aboriginal Arts Board (1973) and their joint proposal for a Gallery of Aboriginal Australia (1975) form the basis of this discussion and are representative of federal initiatives to “salvage”, collect and promote Indigenous Australian culture within the national image. Despite commitments to controlling Indigenous representations as a “tribal” phenomenon, the late 1960s saw cultural nationalism flourish and Indigenous Australians achieve symbolic recognition in the 1967 Referendum. By the 1970s, shifting scholarly paradigms transformed artistic patronage towards a policy of self-determination for the arts as Indigenous activism succeeded in forcing change within cultural institutions. Proposals for a Gallery of Aboriginal Australia typified the aspirations of policymakers who sought a greater Indigenous emphasis in Australia's cultural identity and, for Indigenous people, promised to reform colonial representations. The gallery's delayed emergence revealed the declining cultural vision of previous decades as Indigenous Australians continued to push the structures of governance to value their cultural knowledge.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)385-399
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Australian Studies
    Volume45
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '“A Healthy Nationalism”: The Inclusion of Indigenous Australians in the Federal Cultural Policymaking of the 1960s and 1970s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this