Abstract
“Voluntary” land transfer agreements, negotiated directly between “willing buyers and willing sellers”, present a seemingly empowering alternative to the use of legal instruments for land acquisition or transfer which entail forced displacement. Yet asymmetrical bargaining power between the negotiating parties can undermine the fairness of negotiated outcomes and the right of the sellers to a “no-displacement” option. Viewed against a complex background of bourgeoning land transfers in multiple sites, this article examines rights-based and risks-based approaches to negotiated settlements, concluding that measures to address asymmetries in bargaining power must look beyond enhanced negotiation procedures to address underlying social and political dimensions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 673-685 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Development in Practice |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Jul 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A no-displacement option? Rights, risks and negotiated settlement in development displacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver