Abstract
This study analyses the relative performance in terms of welfare of the current US PAYG system compared to an array of cost equivalent alternative specifications of means-tested pension programmes. We conduct our analysis under two different settings. While in the first setting, individuals have standard preferences; in the second setting, individuals have self-control preferences. We show that the implications of the reform substantially differ across the two settings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 247-260 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Economic Papers |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2019 |