Abstract
The Williams & Ratcliff (1980) and Zelen (1957) methods for the analysis of covariance in incomplete block designs with recovery of inter‐block information are compared using data from a balanced incomplete block design. The former is shown to be more efficient. Other advantages of the Williams & Ratcliff formulation are also presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 337-341 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Statistics |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 1984 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE IN BALANCED INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver