Abstract
I argue that Gregg Rosenberg's panexperientialism is either extremely implausible or irrelevant to the mystery of consciousness by introducing metaphysical and conceptual objections to his appeal to the notion of 'protoconsciousness'.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Psyche |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A place for protoconsciousness?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver