A research routine to assess bias introduced by low response rates in postal surveys.

Rosemary Ford*, Gabriele Bammer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Low response rates to postal surveys potentially bias study results. We used three approaches to determine why 46 per cent of a sample were non-responders, and to analyse any potential bias. Labour force data, telephone interviews with a number of non-responders and trend examination showed that our study sample was no different to the known nursing population, that there were few differences between responders and non-responders and that there were no trends in differences between early and late responders respectively. Results suggest 'intenders', or potential responders who do not complete and return the survey, are a key factor in non-response in surveys of nurses. Analysis for response bias increases confidence in the interpretations and conclusions of any study and should therefore become standard survey practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-53
Number of pages10
JournalNurse researcher
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A research routine to assess bias introduced by low response rates in postal surveys.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this