Abstract
The definition of gnōstikoi, gnostikos or gnōsis is an on-going controversy among contemporary readers, but the ancient Gnosticism is generally comprehended with the metaphysical dualism ofPlatonism (427348 BCE). The history of Gnosticism is developed – with the legendary stories of Simon Magus, Menander, Saturninus, Nicolaitans and Cerinthus, Carpocratians, Justin the Gnostic, Ophites, Ophians, and Cainites. The church fathers of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandrian, Epiphanius of Salamis, and Hippolytus of Rome considered the Gnostic movements as Christian heresies. The emergence of Tchacos Codex (TC) recently impacted the Gnostic readership. In particular, the Coptic text of TC 3358 was regarded – with curiosity. How is the ancient text, so called the Gospel of Judas, unique compared with the previous Gnostic texts? How isJudas related to the Sethian tradition? What was the role of the text? If Judas was a community canon, how can one draw a picture of a Sethian community? The Judas scholars between 2006 and 2010 have explored various topics. However, the reconstruction of the Ohio fragments unveiled more secret scenes afterward. This paper will not only reconsider the traditional perspective on the original Coptic text and its value as a socio-religious instruction, but also demonstrate the characteristics of the Judas Sethian community among the marginalized gnostic groups of the middle second century.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-120 |
Journal | Korean Journal of Religious Studies |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |