A simple frequency-scaling rule for animal communication

Neville H. Fletcher*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    133 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Different animals use widely different frequencies for sound communication, and it is reasonable to assume that evolution has adapted these frequencies to give greatest conspecific communication distance for a given vocal effort. Acoustic analysis shows that the optimal communication frequency is inversely proportional to about the 0.4 power of the animal's body mass. Comparison with observational data indicates that this prediction is well supported in practice. For animals of a given class, for example mammals, the maximum communication distance varies about as the 0.6 power of the animal's mass. There is, however, a wide spread of observed results because of the different emphasis placed upon vocal effort in the evolution of different animal species.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2334-2338
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
    Volume115
    Issue number5 I
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A simple frequency-scaling rule for animal communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this