A Supreme Court or a Constitutional Jirga?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter investigates the role that the Supreme Court has played in the context of an increasing democratic deficit and the emergence of what is being widely referred to as a civil-military hybrid regime in Pakistan. It closely analyses high-profile constitutional cases before and after the 2018 elections, and the resulting transfer of power to the incumbent government. The chapter argues that in such cases involving matters of high constitutional law and politics the apex court has developed a method to temporarily reduce the political and inter-institutional tensions by mediating between the various power centres and reaching intermediate outcomes, rather than principled peremptory decisions. While such judicial intervention temporarily reduces political strains, it ultimately enables the hybrid regime to assert its dominance under the cover of judicial oversight, contributing to autocratization in Pakistan.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Autocratization in South Asia
EditorsSten Widmalm
Place of PublicationTBA
PublisherRoutledge
Pages173-182
Volume1
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780367486747
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Supreme Court or a Constitutional Jirga?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this