TY - JOUR
T1 - AcaWriter A learning analytics tool for formative feedback on academic writing
AU - Knight, Simon
AU - Shibani, Antonette
AU - Abel, Sophie
AU - Gibson, Andrew
AU - Ryan, Philippa
AU - Sutton, Nicole
AU - Wight, Raechel
AU - Lucas, Cherie
AU - Sándor, Ágnes
AU - Kitto, Kirsty
AU - Liu, Ming
AU - Mogarkar, Radhika Vijay
AU - Shum, Simon Buckingham
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, University of Antwerp.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Written communication is an important skill across academia, the workplace, and civic participation. Effective writing incorporates instantiations of particular text structures-rhetorical moves-that communicate intent to the reader. These rhetorical moves are important across a range of academic styles of writing, including essays and research abstracts, as well as in forms of writing in which one reflects on learning gained through experience. However, learning how to effectively instantiate and use these rhetorical moves is a challenge. Moreover, educators often struggle to provide feedback supporting this learning, particularly at scale. Where effective support is provided, the techniques can be hard to share beyond single implementation sites. We address these challenges through the open-source AcaWriter tool, which provides feedback on rhetorical moves, with a design that allows feedback customization for specific contexts. We introduce three example implementations in which we have customized the tool and evaluated it with regard to user perceptions, and its impact on student writing. We discuss the tool's general theoretical background and provide a detailed technical account. We conclude with four recommendations that emphasize the potential of collaborative approaches in building, sharing and evaluating writing tools in research and practice.
AB - Written communication is an important skill across academia, the workplace, and civic participation. Effective writing incorporates instantiations of particular text structures-rhetorical moves-that communicate intent to the reader. These rhetorical moves are important across a range of academic styles of writing, including essays and research abstracts, as well as in forms of writing in which one reflects on learning gained through experience. However, learning how to effectively instantiate and use these rhetorical moves is a challenge. Moreover, educators often struggle to provide feedback supporting this learning, particularly at scale. Where effective support is provided, the techniques can be hard to share beyond single implementation sites. We address these challenges through the open-source AcaWriter tool, which provides feedback on rhetorical moves, with a design that allows feedback customization for specific contexts. We introduce three example implementations in which we have customized the tool and evaluated it with regard to user perceptions, and its impact on student writing. We discuss the tool's general theoretical background and provide a detailed technical account. We conclude with four recommendations that emphasize the potential of collaborative approaches in building, sharing and evaluating writing tools in research and practice.
KW - Feedback
KW - Genre theory
KW - Learning analytics
KW - Rhetorical moves
KW - Writing analytics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080067841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17239/JOWR-2020.12.01.06
DO - 10.17239/JOWR-2020.12.01.06
M3 - Article
SN - 2030-1006
VL - 12
SP - 141
EP - 186
JO - Journal of Writing Research
JF - Journal of Writing Research
IS - 1
ER -