Abstract
Many of us think we have agent-centred options to act suboptimally. Some of these involve favouring our own interests. Others involve sacrificing them. In this paper, I explore three different ways to accommodate agent-centred options in a criterion of objective permissibility. I argue against satisficing and rational pluralism and in favour of a principle built around sensitivity to personal cost.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 233-255 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly |
Volume | 100 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2019 |