Accounting for afforestation externalities: A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling

Joan Mogas*, Pere Riera, Jeff Bennett

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    One issue faced by those using social cost-benefit analysis to make decisions on forestation is how to account for environmental externalities. This paper compares two different valuation techniques, contingent valuation and choice modelling. Both approaches were applied to an afforestation programme in the northeast of Spain, and were found to yield similar estimates of welfare change when the utility function was fully specified. However, when elements of the utility function were omitted, significant differences were detected in the welfare estimates derived from the two techniques. Choice modelling is the method recommended for use in policy evaluation contexts, such as cost-benefit analysis applications, because of the additional valuation information it provides.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)44-58
    Number of pages15
    JournalEuropean Environment
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for afforestation externalities: A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this