Accounting for the Dependence of Coil Sensitivity on Sample Thickness and Lift-Off in Inductively Coupled Photoconductance Measurements

Lachlan E. Black*, Daniel H. MacDonald

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Inductively coupled photoconductance measurements are widely used to characterize carrier recombination in crystalline silicon. We show that, contrary to what is usually supposed, the sensitivity of such measurements is significantly dependent on sample thickness in the range of typical wafer thicknesses, due to the attenuation of the magnetic field with distance from the coil. Sample thickness, as well as any separation from the coil, should, therefore, be taken into account in system calibration in order to avoid systematic errors. We investigate the magnitude of this effect both experimentally and via analytical and finite-element modeling for a range of commercial photoconductance measurement systems with varying coil geometry. Finite-element modeling is used to identify the functional form of the attenuation in the regime of interest, and simple formulae are derived which allow the experimentalist to correct for sample thickness and lift-off. Close agreement is found between modeled and experimental attenuation behavior. Finite-element modeling is also used to evaluate the magnitude of skin effects, which are found to have a minor influence on the measured conductance for the most highly conductive samples, and to determine the lateral spatial variation of the coil sensitivity, which is important for lifetime imaging techniques where photoconductance measurements are used for calibration.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number8876688
    Pages (from-to)1563-1574
    Number of pages12
    JournalIEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
    Volume9
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for the Dependence of Coil Sensitivity on Sample Thickness and Lift-Off in Inductively Coupled Photoconductance Measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this