Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia: A population-based descriptive study

Stephen J. Robson, Paula Laws, Elizabeth A. Sullivan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    40 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: To compare the rate of serious adverse perinatal outcomes of term labour between private and public maternity hospitals in Australia. Design, setting and participants: A population-based study of 789 240 term singleton births in public and private hospitals in 2001-2004, using data from the National Perinatal Data Collection. Main outcome measures: Third- and fourth-degree perineal injury, requirement for high level of neonatal resuscitation, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, admission to neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery, and perinatal death. Results: 31.4% of the term singleton births occurred in private hospitals. After adjusting for maternal age, Indigenous status, parity, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, remoteness of usual residence, and method of birth, the rates of all adverse outcomes studied were higher for public hospital births. For women, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for third- or fourth-degree perineal injury was 2.28 (95% CI, 2.16-2.40). For babies, the odds of a high level of resuscitation (AOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.17-2.59), low Apgar score (AOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.65-1.84), intensive care requirement (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.45-1.51) and perinatal death (AOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.78-2.29) were all higher in public hospitals. Conclusion: For women delivering a single baby at term in Australia, the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes is higher in public hospitals than in private hospitals.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)474-477
    Number of pages4
    JournalMedical Journal of Australia
    Volume190
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Adverse outcomes of labour in public and private hospitals in Australia: A population-based descriptive study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this