Age discrimination in turbulent times

Margaret Thornton, Trish Luker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Concerns about the ramifications of a rapidly ageing population have generally focused on the post-retirement period, with limited scholarly attention to the experience of ageism in the workplace. Despite a shift in policy against early retirement, ʻolder workersʼ — who may be as young as 40 — are disproportionately experiencing age discrimination, often resulting in joblessness. We argue that in a postmodern environment, where the culture of ʻyouthismʼ predominates, the workplace is undergoing significant changes. In the new knowledge economy, characterised by technological knowhow, flexibility and choice, traditional values such as maturity, experience and loyalty have become passé. Drawing on Australian complaints and reported decisions of age discrimination in the workplace in the context of the international literature, we demonstrate the variety of forms ageism is taking. We argue that age discrimination legislation reflects an outdated modernist paradigm that fails to address the experience of older workers. In addition, as part of the culture of youthism, work is now being gauged by its capacity to create an aesthetic of pleasure.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)141-171
    Number of pages31
    JournalGriffith Law Review
    Volume19
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Age discrimination in turbulent times'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this