Age Reporting in the CLHLS: A Re-assessment

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Age reporting among respondents in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey is examined, using the first round of data collected in 1998. The sample design limits the use of traditional methods for assessing the accuracy of age reporting, and innovative methods are adopted. Only the sample aged 100+ is representative of the population at that age. The age structure of centenarians is compared with populations with good age reporting, demonstrating age exaggeration. At ages 80+, constructed estimates of age at childbearing show systematic effects consistent with age exaggeration, particularly in Guangxi and among ethnic minorities. Increasing age exaggeration with age is present in these data, which is at least partly the result of the age structure. These findings have implications for substantive analyses, and further examination of the quality of these data is needed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSpringer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis
    PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
    Pages79-98
    Number of pages20
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Publication series

    NameSpringer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis
    Volume20
    ISSN (Print)1877-2560
    ISSN (Electronic)2215-1990

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Age Reporting in the CLHLS: A Re-assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this