TY - JOUR
T1 - Agenda Control and Timing of Bill Initiation
T2 - A Temporal Perspective on Coalition Governance in Parliamentary Democracies
AU - König, Thomas
AU - Lin, Nick
AU - Lu, Xiao
AU - Silva, Thiago N.
AU - Yordanova, Nikoleta
AU - Zudenkova, Galina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association.
PY - 2022/2/27
Y1 - 2022/2/27
N2 - Although democratic governance imposes temporal constraints, the timing of government policy making activities such as bill initiation is still poorly understood. This holds especially under coalition governments, in which government bills need to find approval by a partner party in parliament. We propose a dynamic temporal perspective in which ministers do not know whether they face a cooperative or competitive partner at the beginning of a term, but they learn this over time and use their agenda control to time further bill initiation in response. A circular regression analysis using data on more than 25,000 government bills from 11 parliamentary democracies over 30 years supports this temporal perspective, showing that ministers initiate bills later in the term when their previous bills have experienced greater scrutiny. Ministers further delay bill initiation when coalition parties' incentives to deviate from compromise increase and when they have less power to constrain their bills' scrutiny.
AB - Although democratic governance imposes temporal constraints, the timing of government policy making activities such as bill initiation is still poorly understood. This holds especially under coalition governments, in which government bills need to find approval by a partner party in parliament. We propose a dynamic temporal perspective in which ministers do not know whether they face a cooperative or competitive partner at the beginning of a term, but they learn this over time and use their agenda control to time further bill initiation in response. A circular regression analysis using data on more than 25,000 government bills from 11 parliamentary democracies over 30 years supports this temporal perspective, showing that ministers initiate bills later in the term when their previous bills have experienced greater scrutiny. Ministers further delay bill initiation when coalition parties' incentives to deviate from compromise increase and when they have less power to constrain their bills' scrutiny.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113741944&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0003055421000897
DO - 10.1017/S0003055421000897
M3 - Article
SN - 0003-0554
VL - 116
SP - 231
EP - 248
JO - American Political Science Review
JF - American Political Science Review
IS - 1
ER -