AI Hyperrealism: Why AI Faces Are Perceived as More Real Than Human Ones

Elizabeth J. Miller, Ben A. Steward, Zak Witkower, Clare A.M. Sutherland, Eva G. Krumhuber, Amy Dawel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that AI-generated faces are now indistinguishable from human faces. However, algorithms are trained disproportionately on White faces, and thus White AI faces may appear especially realistic. In Experiment 1 (N = 124 adults), alongside our reanalysis of previously published data, we showed that White AI faces are judged as human more often than actual human faces—a phenomenon we term AI hyperrealism. Paradoxically, people who made the most errors in this task were the most confident (a Dunning-Kruger effect). In Experiment 2 (N = 610 adults), we used face-space theory and participant qualitative reports to identify key facial attributes that distinguish AI from human faces but were misinterpreted by participants, leading to AI hyperrealism. However, the attributes permitted high accuracy using machine learning. These findings illustrate how psychological theory can inform understanding of AI outputs and provide direction for debiasing AI algorithms, thereby promoting the ethical use of AI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1390-1403
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Science
Volume34
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI Hyperrealism: Why AI Faces Are Perceived as More Real Than Human Ones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this