All the news that's fit to film? Copying the nichols collection of early london newspapers

Mark S. Dawson*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Working with early newspapers is notoriously difficult, not to say onerous. Aside from questions of definition - what sort of format, content, or periodicity constitutes a newspaper? - tracking the multitude of serials that poured from the presses on a weekly or daily basis in later Stuart and early Georgian London has tested bibliographers and historians alike. Publishers lost count of their issue numbers, especially when a hasty reprinting of a day's edition was needed to meet unexpected demand, or, occasionally, to create demand by deliberately inflating these same numbers to give an exaggerated sense of the paper's regularity cum longevity. Compounding these bibliographic headaches is the hijacking of titles. Rival publications bearing the same nomenclature appeared on the capital's streets within hours of each other. Since it was not unusual for a title to be printed at more than one press, first readers were themselves not immediately aware of any counterfeit.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)129-138
    Number of pages10
    JournalParergon
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'All the news that's fit to film? Copying the nichols collection of early london newspapers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this