TY - JOUR
T1 - Ambidexterity in strategic alliances
T2 - An integrative review of the literature
AU - Zahoor, Nadia
AU - Khan, Zaheer
AU - Marinova, Svetla
AU - Cui, Lin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Management Reviews published by British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Strategic alliances play a vital role in exploration and exploitation activities, otherwise known as the ambidextrous approach for value creation. This has led to an upsurge in studies on ambidexterity in strategic alliances by giving rise to various conceptualizations and theoretical challenges. However, we lack a systematic evaluation and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical insights from this growing body of research. In this paper, we use an integrative systematic literature review (SLR) approach to critically analyse 77 articles on ambidexterity in strategic alliances published in 38 leading journals across 13 disciplines. Findings from bibliometric and qualitative content analyses reveal three major research directions: (1) micro-foundation and organizational antecedents of ambidexterity in alliances, (2) governance mechanisms of ambidexterity, and (3) relational and performance outcomes of ambidexterity. We integrate these findings into a unified framework which provides a foundation for future research on ambidexterity in strategic alliances, with implications for academics, policymakers and practitioners.
AB - Strategic alliances play a vital role in exploration and exploitation activities, otherwise known as the ambidextrous approach for value creation. This has led to an upsurge in studies on ambidexterity in strategic alliances by giving rise to various conceptualizations and theoretical challenges. However, we lack a systematic evaluation and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical insights from this growing body of research. In this paper, we use an integrative systematic literature review (SLR) approach to critically analyse 77 articles on ambidexterity in strategic alliances published in 38 leading journals across 13 disciplines. Findings from bibliometric and qualitative content analyses reveal three major research directions: (1) micro-foundation and organizational antecedents of ambidexterity in alliances, (2) governance mechanisms of ambidexterity, and (3) relational and performance outcomes of ambidexterity. We integrate these findings into a unified framework which provides a foundation for future research on ambidexterity in strategic alliances, with implications for academics, policymakers and practitioners.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169078028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ijmr.12348
DO - 10.1111/ijmr.12348
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169078028
SN - 1460-8545
VL - 26
SP - 82
EP - 109
JO - International Journal of Management Reviews
JF - International Journal of Management Reviews
IS - 1
ER -