An Evaluation of Super-Valid Restricted Randomization

Emlyn R. Williams; Hans Peter Piepho

doi:10.1007/s13253-014-0186-x

An Evaluation of Super-Valid Restricted Randomization

Emlyn R. Williams^*, Hans Peter Piepho

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Designs exhibiting super-valid restricted randomization have been proposed as alternatives to efficient row–column designs in situations where the column variance component is small. This paper examines some existing uniformity data and results from two field variety trial programs and concludes that in these situations efficient row–column designs are to be preferred.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	470-478
Number of pages	9
Journal	Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics
Volume	19
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0186-x
Publication status	Published - Dec 2014

Access to Document

10.1007/s13253-014-0186-x

Cite this

@article{b846151459cb42f9a6730344cdd46462,

title = "An Evaluation of Super-Valid Restricted Randomization",

abstract = "Designs exhibiting super-valid restricted randomization have been proposed as alternatives to efficient row–column designs in situations where the column variance component is small. This paper examines some existing uniformity data and results from two field variety trial programs and concludes that in these situations efficient row–column designs are to be preferred.",

keywords = "Average efficiency factor, Row–column designs, Super-valid designs, Uniformity data, Variance components",

author = "Williams, {Emlyn R.} and Piepho, {Hans Peter}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014, International Biometric Society.",

year = "2014",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s13253-014-0186-x",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "470--478",

journal = "Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics",

issn = "1085-7117",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evaluation of Super-Valid Restricted Randomization

AU - Williams, Emlyn R.

AU - Piepho, Hans Peter

PY - 2014/12

Y1 - 2014/12

N2 - Designs exhibiting super-valid restricted randomization have been proposed as alternatives to efficient row–column designs in situations where the column variance component is small. This paper examines some existing uniformity data and results from two field variety trial programs and concludes that in these situations efficient row–column designs are to be preferred.

AB - Designs exhibiting super-valid restricted randomization have been proposed as alternatives to efficient row–column designs in situations where the column variance component is small. This paper examines some existing uniformity data and results from two field variety trial programs and concludes that in these situations efficient row–column designs are to be preferred.

KW - Average efficiency factor

KW - Row–column designs

KW - Super-valid designs

KW - Uniformity data

KW - Variance components

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925506200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13253-014-0186-x

DO - 10.1007/s13253-014-0186-x

M3 - Article

SN - 1085-7117

VL - 19

SP - 470

EP - 478

JO - Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics

JF - Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics

IS - 4

ER -

An Evaluation of Super-Valid Restricted Randomization

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this