An examination of resource-based and fit-based theories of stereotyping under cognitive load and fit

Mark A. Nolan*, S. Alexander Haslam, Russell Spears, Penelope J. Oakes

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Should stereotyping be characterised as an act of cognitive miserliness of one of rational meaning-seeking? This paper uses a cognitive load paradigm to investigate the adequacy of popular resource-based explanations of stereotyping in comparison to an alternative fit-based or meaning-based explanation. In Experiment 1, load was increased by means of concurrent tasks within a highly fitting context (where targets generally behaved in a stereotype-consistent fashion). A linear decrease in stereotyping resulted as measured by category confusions on a who-said what recognition task (Taylor, Fiske, Etcoff & Ruderman, 1978). This outcome is inconsistent with a resource-based analysis of stereotyping. Experiment 2 manipulated load as stimulus exposure time. Although load was successfully imposed in this second experiment, stereotyping neither increased nor decreased as a function of load. The concept of cognitive load and the importance of fit for the analysis of stereotyping are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)641-663
    Number of pages23
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume29
    Issue number5-6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An examination of resource-based and fit-based theories of stereotyping under cognitive load and fit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this