An objective perimetry study of central versus peripheral sensitivities and delays in age-related macular degeneration

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare central versus peripheral retinal sensitivities and delays in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP). Methods: We recruited 18 patients with nAMD and commenced Pro re nata intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection. We compared macular (±15 degrees) and wide-field (±30 degrees) mfPOP variants. We examined temporal corre-lations between treated and untreated fellow eyes. We fitted linear models to selected treatment patterns, and compared the ability of central versus peripheral responses to predict the need for treatment. Results: Central sensitivity decreased by −2.23 ± 0.051 dB/month (P < 0.0002) in treated eyes, and −0.17 ± 0.07 dB/month (P = 0.033) in untreated eyes. Treated eyes showed quicker central responses by 13.08 ± 3.77 ms than untreated eyes (P = 0.001). Based on peripheral responses, we identified two eye-types. Among positive-eyes peripheral sensitivity increased by 9.88 ± 4.41 dB (P = 0.042) before treatment; delays increased by 3.49 ± 1.75 ms/month (P = 0.049). For negative-eyes peripheral delays were shorter a month before treatment by 9.38 ± 3.59 ms (P = 0.013). Correla-tions between treatment and peripheral sensitivities or delays peaked at 1 to 2 months post-treatment. Peripheral data significantly determined treatment frequency and final acuity (all P < 0.044). Conclusions: Peripheral macular function of treated and untreated eyes divided eyes into positive and negative groups. Those peripheral responses determined outcomes; changes preceding active disease by 1 to 3 months. Overall, mfPOP may provide potential biomarkers to assist nAMD management.