An uneasy encounter: Male circumcision, jewish difference, and german law

Mareike Riedel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The religious tradition of male circumcision has come increasingly under attack across a number of European states. While critics of the practice argue that the problem is about children’s rights and the proper relationship between secular and religious traditions, Jews tend to see these attacks within the longer history of attempts to assimilate and remake them according to the norms of the majority. Using the 2012 German legal controversy concerning the issue as my vantage point, I explore how contemporary criticism of male circumcision remains entangled with ambivalence toward Judaism and the Jews as the “other.” Through a close reading of the arguments, I show how opponents use the seemingly neutral language of universal human rights to (re)make Jewish difference according to the norms of the majority. I conclude by arguing that such an approach to this issue runs the risk of turning Jews once again into strangers at a time when cultural anxieties are troubling European societies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationStudies in Law Politics and Society
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Pages55-84
Number of pages30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameStudies in Law Politics and Society
Volume79
ISSN (Print)1059-4337

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An uneasy encounter: Male circumcision, jewish difference, and german law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this