Analytic radicalism

Brad Taylor

doi:10.1007/s10602-013-9134-y

Analytic radicalism

Brad Taylor^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Brennan and Hamlin provide a normative justification for dispositional conservatism based on the concave value functions which give rise to quasi-risk aversion. This note modifies this argument for "analytic conservatism" by allowing jurisdictional exit in response to institutional decline. By providing a welfare floor which limits the cost of failure, exit reverses the normative implications of Brennan and Hamlin's argument, making risk-neutral agents quasi-risk seeking and justifying a radical disposition to reform under some circumstances.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	166-172
Number of pages	7
Journal	Constitutional Political Economy
Volume	24
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-013-9134-y
Publication status	Published - Jun 2013

Access to Document

10.1007/s10602-013-9134-y

Cite this

@article{bd2c983c470143618eb6591b43988f0e,

title = "Analytic radicalism",

abstract = "Brennan and Hamlin provide a normative justification for dispositional conservatism based on the concave value functions which give rise to quasi-risk aversion. This note modifies this argument for {"}analytic conservatism{"} by allowing jurisdictional exit in response to institutional decline. By providing a welfare floor which limits the cost of failure, exit reverses the normative implications of Brennan and Hamlin's argument, making risk-neutral agents quasi-risk seeking and justifying a radical disposition to reform under some circumstances.",

keywords = "Conservatism, Constitutional political economy, Exit, Radicalism, Risk preference, Tiebout competition",

author = "Brad Taylor",

year = "2013",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s10602-013-9134-y",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "166--172",

journal = "Constitutional Political Economy",

issn = "1043-4062",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytic radicalism

AU - Taylor, Brad

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Brennan and Hamlin provide a normative justification for dispositional conservatism based on the concave value functions which give rise to quasi-risk aversion. This note modifies this argument for "analytic conservatism" by allowing jurisdictional exit in response to institutional decline. By providing a welfare floor which limits the cost of failure, exit reverses the normative implications of Brennan and Hamlin's argument, making risk-neutral agents quasi-risk seeking and justifying a radical disposition to reform under some circumstances.

AB - Brennan and Hamlin provide a normative justification for dispositional conservatism based on the concave value functions which give rise to quasi-risk aversion. This note modifies this argument for "analytic conservatism" by allowing jurisdictional exit in response to institutional decline. By providing a welfare floor which limits the cost of failure, exit reverses the normative implications of Brennan and Hamlin's argument, making risk-neutral agents quasi-risk seeking and justifying a radical disposition to reform under some circumstances.

KW - Conservatism

KW - Constitutional political economy

KW - Exit

KW - Radicalism

KW - Risk preference

KW - Tiebout competition

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84878276406

U2 - 10.1007/s10602-013-9134-y

DO - 10.1007/s10602-013-9134-y

M3 - Article

SN - 1043-4062

VL - 24

SP - 166

EP - 172

JO - Constitutional Political Economy

JF - Constitutional Political Economy

IS - 2

ER -

Analytic radicalism

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this