Animal navigation: The difficulty of moving in a straight line

Allen Cheung*, Shaowu Zhang, Christian Stricker, Mandyam V. Srinivasan

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    117 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In principle, there are two strategies for navigating a straight course. One is to use an external directional reference and continually reorienting with reference to it, while the other is to infer body rotations from internal sensory information only. We show here that, while the first strategy will enable an animal or mobile agent to move arbitrarily far away from its starting point, the second strategy will not do so, even after an infinite number of steps. Thus, an external directional reference-some form of compass-is indispensable for ensuring progress away from home. This limitation must place significant constraints on the evolution of biological navigation systems. Some specific examples are discussed. An important corollary arising from the analysis of compassless navigation is that the maximum expected displacement represents a robust measure of the straightness of a path.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-61
    Number of pages15
    JournalBiological Cybernetics
    Volume97
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Animal navigation: The difficulty of moving in a straight line'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this