Anomalies, probings, insights: Ken Foreman's role in the sampling inference controversy of the late 20th century

Ken Brewer*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper is based on the author's recollections of work done for and with E.K. Foreman, and later developments of that work. It describes most particularly the author's early intimations of the potential for using prediction models in survey sampling, the reasons why the use of such models, especially for inferential purposes, was so strongly resisted in the second half of the 20th century, the manner in which randomization and prediction inferences can be combined, and some advantages flowing from that combination.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)385-399
    Number of pages15
    JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics
    Volume47
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Anomalies, probings, insights: Ken Foreman's role in the sampling inference controversy of the late 20th century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this