Abstract
There is a difference between acting with a probability of making a difference to who is harmed, and worsening someone’s prospect. This difference is relevant to debates about the ethics of offsetting, since it means that showing that emitting-and-offsetting has the first feature is not a way of showing that it has the second feature. In an earlier paper, we illustrate this difference with an example of a lottery in which you shake the bag from which a ball will be drawn to determine the identity of the person who will suffer a harm. Here, we reply to Stefansson and Willners’ criticism of that example, explaining how their reply makes a mistake about the point of the example.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 153-158 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Ethics, Policy and Environment |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 26 Dec 2023 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Another Shake of the Bag: Stefansson and Willners on Offsetting and Risk Imposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver