Anthropology and the theorisation of citizenship

Andrew Kipnis*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper I argue for the importance of theorising citizenship as an independent axis of social inequality in the contemporary world. As a foil, I take two intertwined tendencies within anthropological writings on migration. First is the historical trend of anthropology as a discipline to theorise against the grain of the nation-state. Second is the tendency within anthropological studies of transnationalism and migration to theorise their subject in terms of Marxian understandings of class and exploitation or in terms of the intersecting dimensions of race, class and gender (but not citizenship). The result of these approaches is to elide the role of national boundaries and citizenship as significant theoretical objects in themselves. To build my approach, I contrast the production of migrant ‘illegality’ in three national contexts: the United States, China and Australia.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)257-278
    Number of pages22
    JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
    Volume5
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropology and the theorisation of citizenship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this