Anthropology vs. Ethnography in native title: A review article in the context of Peter Sutton’s native title in Australia

James F. Weiner*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Native Title anthropology is changing rapidly as lawyers and judges alter their perceptions of it in the light of successive court hearings. As a practising native title anthropologist, I am concerned about the ever-widening gap between native title anthropology and the project of ethnography as I still construe it*though it may be that within an anthropology changing as fast as native title itself, I may not be in a position to characterise ethnography to the satisfaction of many of my colleagues any more. In this article, I examine Peter Suttons Native Title in Australia alongside several other related titles and, while I do not intend this to be a full-scale review article, I do hope that it provides one interpretation of the current relationship between disciplinary anthropology, what I perceive to be its theoretical underpinnings, and the demands of its native title sub-speciality.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)151-168
    Number of pages18
    JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Anthropology
    Volume8
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropology vs. Ethnography in native title: A review article in the context of Peter Sutton’s native title in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this