Abstract
Native Title anthropology is changing rapidly as lawyers and judges alter their perceptions of it in the light of successive court hearings. As a practising native title anthropologist, I am concerned about the ever-widening gap between native title anthropology and the project of ethnography as I still construe it*though it may be that within an anthropology changing as fast as native title itself, I may not be in a position to characterise ethnography to the satisfaction of many of my colleagues any more. In this article, I examine Peter Suttons Native Title in Australia alongside several other related titles and, while I do not intend this to be a full-scale review article, I do hope that it provides one interpretation of the current relationship between disciplinary anthropology, what I perceive to be its theoretical underpinnings, and the demands of its native title sub-speciality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 151-168 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropology vs. Ethnography in native title: A review article in the context of Peter Sutton’s native title in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver