APEC adrift: Implications for economic regionalism in Asia and the Pacific

John Ravenhill*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    APEC’s lack of success in securing tangible benefits in its first decade has particularly disappointed its ‘Western’ members. Its failures stem primarily from three weaknesses: a lack of consensus over its objectives and how these might best be realized; the absence of an institutionalized driving force for the grouping; and a failure to engage with civil society. APEC’s shortcomings have put at risk what is arguably its most significant achievement: the annual meetings that bring together leaders from around the Pacific Rim. Modest changes to organizational procedures might enhance APEC’s prospects – especially if its efforts are concentrated in trade facilitation and economic and technical cooperation rather than on trade liberalization. Such a change in direction would not only return APEC to its roots but also be in accord with the priorities of East Asian governments.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)319-333
    Number of pages15
    JournalPacific Review
    Volume13
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'APEC adrift: Implications for economic regionalism in Asia and the Pacific'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this