Abstract
APEC’s lack of success in securing tangible benefits in its first decade has particularly disappointed its ‘Western’ members. Its failures stem primarily from three weaknesses: a lack of consensus over its objectives and how these might best be realized; the absence of an institutionalized driving force for the grouping; and a failure to engage with civil society. APEC’s shortcomings have put at risk what is arguably its most significant achievement: the annual meetings that bring together leaders from around the Pacific Rim. Modest changes to organizational procedures might enhance APEC’s prospects – especially if its efforts are concentrated in trade facilitation and economic and technical cooperation rather than on trade liberalization. Such a change in direction would not only return APEC to its roots but also be in accord with the priorities of East Asian governments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 319-333 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Pacific Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'APEC adrift: Implications for economic regionalism in Asia and the Pacific'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver