Abstract
While different in their approaches, structure and intended readership, the four books
reviewed here are connected by their common aim of responding to traditional views of
elegy as a minor, ‘softer’ genre, which stands in binary opposition to the magniloquence
of epic
reviewed here are connected by their common aim of responding to traditional views of
elegy as a minor, ‘softer’ genre, which stands in binary opposition to the magniloquence
of epic
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | The Classical Review |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |