Archiving Revolution: the Historical Records Management in Massachusetts Courts

Andrew Henderson

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    The lengthy history of the Massachusetts courts and their establishment as courts of record means that their records of proceedings contain a wealth of information about the development and growth of the colony as part of a nascent United States. Although Massachusetts’ courts are much older than the Federal Court of Australia, they have confronted similar issues in terms of records retention and the vexed question of what constitutes a ‘significant’ record that requires permanent retention. However, through a process of determining historical context, sampling and inspection, the Supreme Judicial Court found that a definition of ‘significance’ was largely unnecessary. This chapter provides an overview of the origins of the Superior Courts’ approach. It suggests that there are elements of the Massachusetts courts’ experience in the development, implementation and maintenance of court records may be valuable in approaching similar superior courts’ collections in Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Court as archive: Rethinking the institutional role of federal superior courts of record
    EditorsAnn Genovese, Trish Luker & Kim Rubenstein
    Place of PublicationCanberra, Australia
    PublisherANU Press
    Pages239-262
    Volume1
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Print)9781760462703
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Archiving Revolution: the Historical Records Management in Massachusetts Courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this