Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS

Abayomi Baiyere; A R Hevner; Shirley Gregor; Matti Rossi; Richard Baskerville

Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS

Abayomi Baiyere, A R Hevner, Shirley Gregor, Matti Rossi, Richard Baskerville

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

With the rising interest in Design Science Research (DSR), it has become crucial to understand what the acceptable components of a DSR paper are, in order to get published. Central to this is the ongoing debate on what constitutes an acceptable contribution in DSR - the artifact, the design theory or both? Two camps have emerged in this debate, and this panel is setup to engage thought leaders from both sides in a scholarly discourse. At the end, we aim to have moved a step towards collectively charting a path for the future of Design Science in the IS discipline.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	36th International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015
Place of Publication	USA
Publisher	AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)
Edition	peer reviewed
ISBN (Print)	9780996683111
Publication status	Published - 2015
Event	International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015 - Fort Worth, Texas Duration: 1 Jan 2015 → … http://icis2015.aisnet.org/en/homepage

Conference

Conference	International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015
Period	1/01/15 → …
Other	December 13-16 2015
Internet address	http://icis2015.aisnet.org/en/homepage

Cite this

@inproceedings{490fae2603e245e688bac7fdf32a9a84,

title = "Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS",

abstract = "With the rising interest in Design Science Research (DSR), it has become crucial to understand what the acceptable components of a DSR paper are, in order to get published. Central to this is the ongoing debate on what constitutes an acceptable contribution in DSR - the artifact, the design theory or both? Two camps have emerged in this debate, and this panel is setup to engage thought leaders from both sides in a scholarly discourse. At the end, we aim to have moved a step towards collectively charting a path for the future of Design Science in the IS discipline.",

author = "Abayomi Baiyere and Hevner, {A R} and Shirley Gregor and Matti Rossi and Richard Baskerville",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780996683111",

booktitle = "36th International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015",

publisher = "AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)",

edition = "peer reviewed",

note = "International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015 ; Conference date: 01-01-2015",

url = "http://icis2015.aisnet.org/en/homepage",

}

Baiyere, A, Hevner, AR, Gregor, S, Rossi, M & Baskerville, R 2015, Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS. in 36th International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015. peer reviewed edn, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), USA, International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, 1/01/15.

Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS. / Baiyere, Abayomi; Hevner, A R; Gregor, Shirley et al.
36th International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015. peer reviewed. ed. USA: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2015.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS

AU - Baiyere, Abayomi

AU - Hevner, A R

AU - Gregor, Shirley

AU - Rossi, Matti

AU - Baskerville, Richard

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - With the rising interest in Design Science Research (DSR), it has become crucial to understand what the acceptable components of a DSR paper are, in order to get published. Central to this is the ongoing debate on what constitutes an acceptable contribution in DSR - the artifact, the design theory or both? Two camps have emerged in this debate, and this panel is setup to engage thought leaders from both sides in a scholarly discourse. At the end, we aim to have moved a step towards collectively charting a path for the future of Design Science in the IS discipline.

AB - With the rising interest in Design Science Research (DSR), it has become crucial to understand what the acceptable components of a DSR paper are, in order to get published. Central to this is the ongoing debate on what constitutes an acceptable contribution in DSR - the artifact, the design theory or both? Two camps have emerged in this debate, and this panel is setup to engage thought leaders from both sides in a scholarly discourse. At the end, we aim to have moved a step towards collectively charting a path for the future of Design Science in the IS discipline.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780996683111

BT - 36th International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015

PB - AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)

CY - USA

T2 - International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015

Y2 - 1 January 2015

ER -

Artifact and/or Theory? Publishing Design Science Research in IS

Abstract

Conference

Fingerprint

Cite this