As you were?:moral philosophy and the aetiology of moral experience

Garrett Cullity*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What is the significance of empirical work on moral judgement for moral philosophy? Although the more radical conclusions that some writers have attempted to draw from this work are overstated, few areas of moral philosophy can remain unaffected by it. The most important question it raises is in moral epistemology. Given the explanation of our moral experience, how far can we trust it? Responding to this, the view defended here emphasizes the interrelatedness of moral psychology and moral epistemology. On this view, the empirical study of moral judgement does have important implications for moral philosophy. But moral philosophy also has important implications for the empirical study of moral judgement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-132
Number of pages16
JournalPhilosophical Explorations
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'As you were?:moral philosophy and the aetiology of moral experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this